imcsf.indymedia.orgsan francisco bay area indymedia
About Us Contact Us Subscribe Calendar Publish
white themeblack themered themetheme help

donate now




printable version - email this article

Worcester Non-Profits Support Anti-Panhandling Campaign

by Kevin Saturday, Jun. 04, 2005 at 8:50 AM

Worcester Non-Profit...
all_lined_up.jpgk3lhnk.jpg, image/jpeg, 600x450


Do No Harm

There’s a recent resurgence of anti-panhandling tough talk and initiatives across the country, and
Worcester’s no different in that respect. What is different though is that Worcester seemingly
stands alone as a community where the social service system has joined in as part of the
legitimization of the effort.

While in other cities it has been downtown business associations (Columbus, Atlanta), hotel
associations (Cincinnati, Philadelphia) and the Chambers of Commerce (Beverley Hills, Dallas)
that have initiated or pushed anti-panhandling efforts, we see a sadly much different mix of
players around the table in Worcester. What a difference to other cities where homeless rights
advocates have pursued legal action against cities and police departments!

Worcester’s panhandling crackdown has been a long developing City Council based phenomenon.
The genesis of Worcester’s effort has been politically based, with the City Manger’s Office and
Worcester Police Department admirably resisting the effort to push and drag them into this pit
hole. It is a shame that our social service agencies couldn’t muster the same level of resistance.

The whole panhandling scenario highlights the problematic relationship that exists in Worcester
given the significant leverage that many agencies perceive City Hall to hold. Although the actual
dollars may be small, many of our much trusted social service agencies feel they ‘depend’ on
federal Community Development Block Grant funding (CDBG), which is carefully handed out
each year. And most believe rocking the boat can be equally as dangerous.

Noticeably absent from the “Panhandling isn’t the Solution” table are organizations such as
Abby’s House, the Mustard Seed, Sts. Francis and Therese Catholic Worker and others that stress
personalism and that have also eschewed the corrupting influences of governmental dollars.
We all owe them a thank you.

On a cursory level, a media campaign to encourage greater giving presents itself as helpful and
beneficial. It is framed as a caring effort, and one with supposed long-term benefits. The City’s
web page declares panhandling a “complex issue”, and we are all encouraged to believe that
giving to charity is the solution. The City feels it has done something, agencies and passerby’s
feel they have done something. Everyone should be happy.

Others will argue that the active participation of agencies has prevented a harsher City response,
keeping the police uninvolved and preventing Draconian ordinances from being passed. While
perhaps this could be true, I have not heard any agencies arguing this perspective, and I would
assert that organizations could still have played this role without adding their names.

The failure of this campaign though begins with the hours of time and resources that have been
dedicated to meetings, honing the message, developing artwork, securing the permission of
corporate media outlets, banks and supermarkets chains. It continues with the dollars, time and
resources harnessed simply in pursuit of public relations and perception. We are wrong to support
this misdirection.

Worcester’s social service agencies are wrong for supporting this effort for a much larger reason.
As organizations whose mission statements trumpet the desire to aid, assist and help, they should
also recognize Hippocrates challenge that we “Do no Harm”. And in fact, in the current anti-poor,
anti-immigrant, anti-PIP resident, anti-kid in baggy clothes in front of city hall climate we are
terribly off track when we support an effort that buttresses and adds to this war.

That’s the crux of the problem as I see it. As someone that has only worked for Worcester non-
profits I would argue that we need to find the courage to be able to say ‘No’. In the climate that
presently exists we should be divorcing ourselves from the present war on the poor, rather than
lending our names to one of the battles. By joining the game we are only perpetuating the anti-
PIP, NIMBY and other issues that will be coming our way.

add your comments


Supporters & Sponsors

by Kevin Saturday, Jun. 04, 2005 at 8:50 AM

Supporters & Sponsor...
brought_to_you_by.jpgwgtu0p.jpg, image/jpeg, 600x212

add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 8 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
3 things I hate about this Ben Nasty Friday, Jun. 24, 2005 at 8:39 AM
Response to "glass half-full" Mike Benedetti Monday, Jun. 06, 2005 at 12:09 PM
No money for ads Mike Benedetti Monday, Jun. 06, 2005 at 11:51 AM
glass half full? Joe Monday, Jun. 06, 2005 at 11:22 AM
Duh! Katie Sunday, Jun. 05, 2005 at 8:20 PM
Ads are not the solution bah Saturday, Jun. 04, 2005 at 10:10 PM
IMC Network: www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq nigeria south africa canada: hamilton maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan manila qc europe: alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol bulgaria croatia cyprus estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege lille madrid malta marseille nantes netherlands nice norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france poland portugal romania russia scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia west vlaanderen latin america: argentina bolivia brasil chiapas chile chile sur colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado danbury, ct dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk idaho ithaca kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma omaha philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca seattle tallahassee-red hills tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign utah vermont virginia beach western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine ukraine process: discussion fbi/legal updates indymedia faq mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

© 2000-2003 Imc Worcester. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Imc Worcester. Running sf-active v0.9 Disclaimer | Privacy