Worcester Non-Profits Support Anti-Panhandling Campaign
by Kevin
Saturday, Jun. 04, 2005 at 8:50 AM
 all_lined_up.jpgk3lhnk.jpg, image/jpeg, 600x450
Do No Harm
There’s a recent resurgence of anti-panhandling tough talk and initiatives across the country, and Worcester’s no different in that respect. What is different though is that Worcester seemingly stands alone as a community where the social service system has joined in as part of the legitimization of the effort.
While in other cities it has been downtown business associations (Columbus, Atlanta), hotel associations (Cincinnati, Philadelphia) and the Chambers of Commerce (Beverley Hills, Dallas) that have initiated or pushed anti-panhandling efforts, we see a sadly much different mix of players around the table in Worcester. What a difference to other cities where homeless rights advocates have pursued legal action against cities and police departments!
Worcester’s panhandling crackdown has been a long developing City Council based phenomenon. The genesis of Worcester’s effort has been politically based, with the City Manger’s Office and Worcester Police Department admirably resisting the effort to push and drag them into this pit hole. It is a shame that our social service agencies couldn’t muster the same level of resistance.
The whole panhandling scenario highlights the problematic relationship that exists in Worcester given the significant leverage that many agencies perceive City Hall to hold. Although the actual dollars may be small, many of our much trusted social service agencies feel they ‘depend’ on federal Community Development Block Grant funding (CDBG), which is carefully handed out each year. And most believe rocking the boat can be equally as dangerous.
Noticeably absent from the “Panhandling isn’t the Solution” table are organizations such as Abby’s House, the Mustard Seed, Sts. Francis and Therese Catholic Worker and others that stress personalism and that have also eschewed the corrupting influences of governmental dollars. We all owe them a thank you.
On a cursory level, a media campaign to encourage greater giving presents itself as helpful and beneficial. It is framed as a caring effort, and one with supposed long-term benefits. The City’s web page declares panhandling a “complex issue”, and we are all encouraged to believe that giving to charity is the solution. The City feels it has done something, agencies and passerby’s feel they have done something. Everyone should be happy.
Others will argue that the active participation of agencies has prevented a harsher City response, keeping the police uninvolved and preventing Draconian ordinances from being passed. While perhaps this could be true, I have not heard any agencies arguing this perspective, and I would assert that organizations could still have played this role without adding their names.
The failure of this campaign though begins with the hours of time and resources that have been dedicated to meetings, honing the message, developing artwork, securing the permission of corporate media outlets, banks and supermarkets chains. It continues with the dollars, time and resources harnessed simply in pursuit of public relations and perception. We are wrong to support this misdirection.
Worcester’s social service agencies are wrong for supporting this effort for a much larger reason. As organizations whose mission statements trumpet the desire to aid, assist and help, they should also recognize Hippocrates challenge that we “Do no Harm”. And in fact, in the current anti-poor, anti-immigrant, anti-PIP resident, anti-kid in baggy clothes in front of city hall climate we are terribly off track when we support an effort that buttresses and adds to this war.
That’s the crux of the problem as I see it. As someone that has only worked for Worcester non- profits I would argue that we need to find the courage to be able to say ‘No’. In the climate that presently exists we should be divorcing ourselves from the present war on the poor, rather than lending our names to one of the battles. By joining the game we are only perpetuating the anti- PIP, NIMBY and other issues that will be coming our way.
Supporters & Sponsors
by Kevin
Saturday, Jun. 04, 2005 at 8:50 AM
 brought_to_you_by.jpgwgtu0p.jpg, image/jpeg, 600x212
LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 8 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
| TITLE |
AUTHOR |
DATE |
| 3 things I hate about this |
Ben Nasty |
Friday, Jun. 24, 2005 at 8:39 AM |
| Response to "glass half-full" |
Mike Benedetti |
Monday, Jun. 06, 2005 at 12:09 PM |
| No money for ads |
Mike Benedetti |
Monday, Jun. 06, 2005 at 11:51 AM |
| glass half full? |
Joe |
Monday, Jun. 06, 2005 at 11:22 AM |
| Duh! |
Katie |
Sunday, Jun. 05, 2005 at 8:20 PM |
| Ads are not the solution |
bah |
Saturday, Jun. 04, 2005 at 10:10 PM |
|
|
|