The on-again, off-again harassment of Worcester’s livery taxis appears to have subsided, lessening frustration and anger within Worcester’s Latino community.

Community members and taxi drivers have reported harassment of patrons and drivers and multiple civil rights violations. On multiple occasions the Worcester Police Department has shut-down business completely, sending drivers home and leaving waiting patrons needing rides to doctors’ appointments and markets stranded.

The targeting of the taxis is another attack against Latino small business owners in Worcester where these businesses are primarily comprised of Ecuadoran and Dominican owners and drivers.

livery3.jpg

The tense situation seems to have ended after at least one meeting between the Worcester Human Rights Commission with Chief Gary Gemme and intervention by former City Councilor Juan Gomez and others.

Drivers, owners and community members have been afraid to speak-out publicly pointing to several high profile stories of Latino businesses in Worcester being vilified, harassed and eventually being forced to close.

The catalog of complaints have included:

* Police Officers removing passengers from vehicles and requesting passengers’ ID’s

* On at least one occasion, a police officer is reported to have taken a passenger’s cel phone to obtain access to the passenger’s private phone-call history.

* Shutting-down all transportation service on multiple occasions leaving drivers without pay, and passengers without rides

* Conducting sting operations, setting-up phony calls for service seeking to catch livery drivers transporting either non-client passengers or unscheduled fares (Under the livery ordinance, livery taxis cannot operate as taxi cabs responding to phone calls for service. All livery passengers are required to have scheduled appointments at least 12 hours earlier and to be registered clients.)

* Repeated reviewing of livery taxi log books and office log books

* Some drivers received multiple $100 tickets/fines

This targeted effort was possible based on re-vised ordinances approved by the Worcester City Council. Earlier this summer, Worcester Police Chief Gary Gemme provided City Council with a copy of the revisions to the “Worcester Police Department Taxi and Livery Regulations”. After contentious Council meetings two years earlier in May, 2006 the Manager sought to pre-empt Council discussion of the Chief’s revisions stating in his cover letter to Council, that the new regulations “do not require the approval of the City Council” and are “for the information of your Honorable Body.”

While the Council’s past debates have primarily focused on Worcester’s taxi cab companies and taxi medallions Chief Gemme’s June ordinance revisions instituted new regulations consolidating the Police Department’s oversight, and seeking to tighten regulations.

Sadly, City Council remained detached and unquestioning as I sat at that Council meeting. That detachment resulting from a lack of understanding of the important role Worcester’s new paratransit system and economy play in low-income and Spanish language communities. In the past, Worcester non-profits and community groups have have advocated for the development and funding of paratransit operations as an important small business initiative.

While there is a role, and obligation for the Chief and WPD to guarantee the safety of livery vehicles, City Councilors have a role and obligation to guarantee that our City has transit systems in place that assist, facilitate and fully respond to the needs of Worcester’s residents and we should also be supporting new small businesses not shutting them down.

As it stands now, if you are primarily Spanish speaking, or someone with limited English, Worcester’s Red and Yellow City sanctioned taxi system is hit or miss if you need to speak with someone in Spanish. Yellow Cab was first rude, and then hung-up on me when I called and twice asked, “¿Puedes hablar español … Spanish?” Worcester’s Latino residents deserve quality service, service which isn’t always available through the monopolized medallion system and Worcester City Council should have had stronger recognition of this need.

The Ecuadoran and Dominican drivers, who each purchase their own Lincoln Continental livery vehicles, licenses and insurance, invest on average $10,000 to operate. And although the Lincoln Continentals that define Worcester’s fleet far outshine the average medallioned taxi cab, the new regulations make it illegal to operate any vehicle older than seven years. In effect the new ordinance imposes a hefty tax that could never conceivably have been forced onto any other local business or industry. It is likely some drivers will go into debt or be forced out of business.

Worcester Police Officials have told City Councilors in the past that they suspected Worcester’s publicos and taxis of ferrying guns and drugs. And the new ordinance was predicated on the assumption that livery taxis are operating illegally and nefariously. Such subterfuge and hostility then became codified even further within an ordinance that also included such anti-business measures as forbidding exterior advertising on vehicles and declaring that the preferred means of transaction not be cash.

Whether it’s the recent anti-vendor initiative, failed NRSA economic development or this crippling of the paratransit system, Worcester has been hostile towards Latino small businesses of late.
Would City Council have ever regulated any other business by making old fashioned advertising illegal and telling Mr. Chamber of Commerce he shouldn’t be using cold hard cash? Never, ‘cuz they’d get their little white butts kicked.

failed NRSA Program

Why do you sate this? The Chandler Business Associaion was approached by Los Centros about tapping into our NRSA funds for English classes for Chandler Street business and we agreed as long as the classes were in a controlled education syle environment and the Latino business tapping into this fund for their employees participate in our business group and the NRSA Program...we got a "nada" from them once we proposed guidlelines - they just wanted a check from us?

Paul Collyer
Chandler Business Association member

failed NRSA Program

BTW

The Chandler Street Business Association is running a very successful program

*multiple business facades completed
*multiple residential projects completed
*working on an college educational program wih MLK & Assumpion College
*working on a security camera system
*working on a cultural event for 2009

Be more specific and make less blanket statements abou a program you evidently have not looked into enough to comment

Paul Collyer
Chandler Street Business Association

Get a clue about Liverys

There are no such thing as "Livery Cabs". There are Livery cars, and then are legal Taxi Cabs!!And, like you said, the big difference is about $50,000 a year in insurance,lincence fees, Quartely Inspection Fees, Medallion fees, regular up-keep ( The Cabs are more maintened than any vehical around!! Including Police cars!!)But I diress,, The Right to Own / Operate a Taxicab in The City of Worcester costs more than most people spend to buy a home.Which I think is justified in the fact that the owner is responsible for the safty of You, Me , our children ( and those of others ), and anything else that might happen on the road. Including safe and compitent drivers that might get yelled at, taken for granted, abused, having to avoid drunk/angry or just plain stupid drivers.They should and ARE held to a higher level of responsibility, which I find comforting when I need a ride.(P.S., I think Jaun Gomez is worse for this City than the Asian Longhorned Beetle, just more destruction!!)

What's happening?

Has anyone notified the ACLU about this or filed any sort of complaint with City Council. People shouldn't be harassed like this. There should be some sort of investigation about why this is happening.

Not as it seems

Maybe this will help clarify, but most certainly will be considered an attack, I wager. I cannot say that the regulations governing taxi service in Worcester are right or wrong.

What I can tell you, is that the "Spanish Cabs" are not selflessly breaking the law to support the spanish community. They stand to make a fortune. They're overhead is a fraction of what a legitimate taxi service's fees and insurance are. They can make up fares off the top of their heads because they are not functioning within the bounds of the law. They can afford to undercut cab companies, because they are paying so much less to do what they are doing.

As far as Spanish speaking call takers, there will always be an argument about the need for the residents of a country to know the native language. The reality is that there are a number of residents who do not. It would help for the cab companies to have Spanish speaking staff, but it is being treated like it should be a requirement. An argument for another topic. I can tell you that if you know enough English to fire off a name and address, maybe a phone number, you might be surprised that it is not all that hard to get a cab that isn't a livery.

Just don't be fooled into believing it is more about supporting the Spanish community than it is about lining their pockets with profits that they didn't pay the overhead to be entitled to.

Re: Not as it seems

The Worcester PD hates Latinos. End of story.

okay then...

...whether true or not, that has nothing to do with why Livery cabs are a target of investigation for functioning illegaly. They have been cheating the system blatantly. They have been stealing profits from companies who are following the rules and paying a tremendous overhead to do so, only to have livery sweep in and take their business with a fake super hero cape claiming they are doing their duty for the Spanish community when they are just unfairly and at cost to others, making a buck.