For over two years the Save Our Poolz Coalition has been told that the City Council's Youth, Parks and Recreation Committee would debate and decide Worcester's pool proposal. Save Our Poolz was told throughout the lengthy hearing process that our City Councilors would take people’s thoughts, concerns and ideas under advisement in making their decision.
City Manager O'Brien decided he was above following the announced public process, and decided to throw City Councilor Michael Germain under the bus. O'Brien's proposes only three new pools based on the Taj Mahal grandiose style already rejected by Save Our Poolz.
Save Our Poolz has consistently advocated for either repairing the pools we have now, or for comparable neighborhood sized pool replacements.
City Manager O'Brien's announcement comes at a time when there is growing consensus that the larger pools are the wrong way for Worcester to go. Most recently, mayoral candidate Joe O'Brien has taken a strong position in favor of retaining Worcester's 9 municipal pools.
The City Manager's decision to ignore public input, the public decision making process and the decision making authority of the City Council's Youth, Parks and Recreation Committee is a slap in the face to democracy here in Worcester.
================
September 1, 2009
TO THE WORCESTER CITY COUNCIL COUNCILORS:
I respectfully request City Council's review, deliberation and endorsement of a request to begin the design of a public pool complex for Crompton Park using available capital funds, as received from Robert L. Moylan, Jr., Commissioner of Public Works & Parks and forwarded for the consideration of your Honorable Body.
Commissioner Moylan has recommended utilizing available capital funds, including the Fiscal Year 2010 Capital Budget authorization, for the design and construction of a swimming pool at Crompton Park that reflects the highly-successful State Shine pool archetype.
There has been a tremendous amount of research, discussion, outreach, and listening undertaken over the last two years regarding the future of our pools here in the City. There is complete consensus as to the real need for state-of-the-art pools within our neighborhoods. We can and must meet this need while also clearly recognizing and acknowledging the long-term financial commitments required to open, maintain and reinvest in these facilities annually. We must build new pools to meet the greatest need within our community, build them with the amenities all our citizens clearly wish for, build only what we can commit to open, maintain, and reinvest in over time, and build them new to standards that will last for their entire useful life.
It is for these reasons that I concur with Commissioner Moylan's core recommendation for the City to ultimately build, open and maintain three new pools total to compliment the State's new Shine Pool at Vernon Hill Park and the soon to be renovated Bennett Field State Pool on Main Street. This core recommendation factors the State's commitment to open their beaches at Regatta Point and Quinsigamond State Park. It also factors our commitment to continue to open, maintain and manage our City beaches at Shore Park, Indian Lake, Coes Pond and Bell Pond, as well as to pursue the continuation and the expansion of the Wheels to Water Program (integration of our private not for profit pools as part of the total aquatics experience). I must note, that going forward and as funding permits, we will and can consider other aspects like splash pads, spray parks or perhaps even smaller pools (if sustainable, non-tax levy funding sources can be identified for pool capital, pool maintenance and pool operations).
I respectfully request City Council's endorsement of this plan: With arid upon endorsement, we will immediately begin to push for the completion of our first of three new pools at Crompton Park by next summer
Respectfully submitted,
Michael V. O'Brien City Manager
CITY OF WORCESTER, MASSACHUSETTS
Department of Public Works and Parks
To: Michael V. O'Brien, City Manager
From: Robert L. Moylan Jr., P.E., Commissioner of Public Works and Parks
Date: August 26, 2009
Re: Communication Relative to Pools
The fiscal 2010 Capital Budget includes $900,000 for-the design and construction of swimming pools. When combined with other capital funds for the same purpose, the city has a total of about $2:5 million. A definitive plan to address the long term aquatic needs in the city has not yet been adopted although I believe there is a consensus that the existing $2.5 million' in capital funds be put to use immediately to build a pool facility for use next summer.
The debate concerning the city's plans for pools and aquatic facilities going forward continues. Suggestions as to how the city addresses this issue have varied but all are steeped in passion and well-intentioned with the goal being that the final plan will provide aquatic opportunities.for all city residents: Debate has ranged from the style of pools to be built to the appropriateness of splash pads or spray parks to the extent of financial commitment the city can afford to make. Notwithstanding the continuing debate and the yet to be adopted aquatics plan for the future, the city has made it clear that it believes the core elementof any plan to address the aquatic needs is the construction of 3 additional pools of a design and type similar to the very successful Shine Pool model recently opened at Vernon Hill Park by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). A similar pool complex is out to bid by DCR now to replace the pool at Bennett Field. It is expected to be in operation for next'summer. With these two facilities in operation, City Council districts' 3 and 5 will have pool facilities.
The Shine Pool opened this July 1st and has been an overwhelming success. This.' single facility has attracted over 10,000 users during a season that has not been conducive to outdoor aquatics. This use is in direct contrast to the average of 2,500 patrons to each of the city's eight pools that were open in 2008. Equally impressive is that, according to the pool facilities manager, the Shine Pool attendance was made up of 70% families with ages ranging from infants to octogenarians and the able.and disabled alike. With this success in mind, the core plan to address the aquatic needs' of the city is to construct similar pools in each of the 3 city council districts that will not have a DCR pool (i.e., D1, D2, & D4). Given that both D1 and D2 have other aquatic opportunities available, it is recommended that this years funding be directed to D4 and preferably to Crompton Park which had the highest attendance of pool facilities in this district.
To support this recommendation of a Shine Pool model at Crompton Park for next year, I offer the following facts:
• Even with a September approval of this recommendation, it will be challenging to have a pool in operation by July 1, 2010. Any delay in making this decision assures that there will be no pool for 2010.
• Although it will be refuted by some, the city's pool consultant estimates the cost to completely renovate each of the city's 1970's style pools to range from $1.25 million to $1.4 million excluding bathhouse facilities. In contrast, the more appealing Shine Pool design, which Includes many additional amenities, is estimated to cost $1.7 million excluding bathhouse.
• Bathhouses, required at pools by statute, are expected to cost an additional $500,000.
• The city's pool consultant has designed and/or operates 37 public pool facilities in New England. They are very familiar with the bidding requirements of Massachusetts Chapter 30 B and Chapter 149 and Prevailing Wage aspects of public bids. Their insight of construction and operational costs of public pools is unassailable.
• DCR developed their design of the Shine Pool by seeking public comment on the desired elements of a public pool complex. They found the public was looking for certain attributes and incorporated them into the Shine Pool design. We should take advantage of the work done by DCR when forming our aquatics plan. The desired attributes are:
o Fully Code compliant
o Fully ADA compliant
o Family oriented
o Multi-generational appeal
o Various interactive play elements
o Environmentally friendly
o State-of-the-art mechanical and filtration systems
Recommendation
There is a predominance of technical advantages, operational benefit and public support that suggests the Shine Pool model is the type of pool that the city should adopt and that satisfies the aquatics challenge. However, the purpose of this memorandum is simply to obtain approval to begin design of a similar facility for Crompton Park using available capital funds so that it might be operational for July 2010. The debate on the number of additional pools to be built, the inclusion of spray facilities or splash pads in an aquatics plan and the timeline during which these facilities can be built will be presented in a subsequent report.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Moylan Jr., P.E. Commissioner of Public Works and Parks
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Sept City Manager Pool Proposal.pdf | 925.99 KB |
City Manager Circumvents Public Process and Open Democ
Similar treatment was practiced during the cable franchise public hearings, and hearings regarding the city retirees, the administration pay raises, and other things. There may have been "hearings" (predetermined albeit) or announcements made to the council, but regarding teh above as it is with the pools, not much of what the community wanted seem to matter. He did what he wanted to do period. You are not surprised are you?
Nisa A.
Dragging the process on and on
This is the signature mark of doing buisness for CITY HALL.
Hold phoney public hearings, never conduct engaging and meaningful dialog, disregard the substance brought forward by the people, pretend you're concerned and listening, hire consultants who will say whatever you pay them to say, never respond with answers or request for information, say things like, "well, I have talk with the manager" , a person hardly ever gets to talk directly with this city manager, say things like, " the manager is playing this close to the vest, I'll see what I can do", let the "process" drag on and on.
SOP's waited eleven months to not get a report, others have waited over two years for other responses and are still waiting.
Why are we all not asking for the manager and council to resign immediately? Are they not supposed to carry out the will of the people? If they are not, what are they doing collecting checks at 455 Main ? The nun who spoke at the council meeting yesterday is my hero. Who was she? That is the real issue this city hall is not carrying out the will of the people. If we can not pay for more neighborhood pools then the city should have provided a detailed response to the SOP recommendation for the nine pools and tried some other way to carry out the will of the people. There was no convincing conversation only a run around instead. It does happens time and time again. Shameful.
Total Dis!
This whole letter is a dis directed at Save Our Poolz. "Steeped in passion and well-intentioned??" In other words, we're clueless bleeding hearts! Our consultants couldn't possibly be familiar with Massachusetts law, but the city's consultants' "insight of construction and operational costs of public pools is unassailable."
How's the view up there?
GIVE IT UP. You guys obviously don't understand how politics... or even LIFE works. You're as unwilling to give in as the people you are "fighting", and then declare anyone who doesn't agree with you to be a racist that cares not for the inner city children. Forget about INSURANCE and APPROPRIATE STAFFING concerns for 9 goddamn pools. I don't like that my property taxes would even be considered spent on any half-baked idea of bunch of manic liberals who barely hold paying jobs, property, or government positions. The only way any of you will implement change is to be elected to public office, and that's a SNOW BALLS CHANCE IN HELL.
Holy Shit! Now you're going to tell me that I must be racist because I acknowledged your planning flaws. Now go buy a house, sink all of your money into it, and then tell me how fabulous this idea is that would no doubt require an increase in property tax to sustain.
Taj Mahal pools, my ass. Glad the view is nice on your rainbow in faery land.
GET A JOB, GUYS
Leah M Shier
Officially tired of POOLZ
Response to personal attack
Leah, I'm sorry you feel this way. And even more disappointed in your need to resort to personal attacks.
I believe Worcester's parks are an extremely important asset, and Worcester's pools a part of them. I believe it is worthwhile for a group of people to work to better ours parks, every bit as much as I believe it is important for Worcester residents to work to better our schools like Stand for Children, or working opportunities for community residents like EPOCA. Each of us is able to enjoy Worcester's dwindling resources because of the work of others to set aside, preserve, care for and defend open-space and park land.
While Save Our Poolz' work has been to get Worcester's pools repaired or rebuilt, Save Our Poolz has also involved countless people more deeply in their own community, introducing them to both the positive and negatives about how Worcester's government, how Worcester's Plan E government, how Worcester's divison of district and at-large City Council seats works and fails.
That the City Manager can circumvent a highly publicized planning process in Worcester should be of concern to all of us, not just Save Our Poolz. Are you in favor of building a City government in which there are no checks and balances and community involvement and public processes are non-existent?
Personal Attacks
The original post is a bunch of personal attacks. They called you "steeped in passion and well-intentioned" and you called them undemocratic.
It's not undemocratic for city officials to ignore a special interest lobby like Poolz. Even though you're grassroots, you're a special interest group. The city charter doesn't require that anyone listen to you. Maybe if you were a bit nicer and clearly addressed the concerns in those PDFs and letters from the city, instead of making personal attacks, people wouldn't feel the need to attack you, and the city would take you seriously. Despite the snide remarks, the city makes a case that the larger pools will serve more people for less money and that your contractors don't understand MA law. Instead of directing your response to the core of their letter --finding quotes from companies that understand MA law and showing the cost per person served is lower for your plan-- you've resorted to name calling. No wonder people respond to you with name calling.
I wouldn't want a special interest group funded by Bank of America to have the kind of access that you're demanding. I don't know that you should get it.
--Long Time Lurker
Re: Personal Attacks
Rosa Tirella summarized it best: "Shove it up your tight butthole! NO! You shove it up your even tighter butthole!"
http://www.incitytimesworcester.org/?p=1991
--Fox News and Right Wing Crowd
It's all relative...
Spend the money on one gigantic pool and fill those pools with kids and community members who might otherwise be mugging you and selling drugs on your street corners; and employ thousands of people for a short time, who might otherwise not be able to feed their families. Seems pretty simple to me.
ERIN @ www.freeringtone.com